Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi, Sven Luther wrote: > >> Because of [1], because they said they will drop security on tier-2 arches >> and >> that porters should be left to fend by themselves, did they not ? > > Nothing's going to prevent porters from adding stable-security (or > whatever) to their autobuilders, so even if "they" drop support, the > only work porters would have to do WRT each security-bugfixed package > would be "sign the .changes file". > > In other words, I don't see a problem here.
There is one problem: These porters would need a debian.org machine to host their archive, and this puts again some workload on the ftpmasters and system admins. From the Vancouver proposal it seemed to me that it was not planned to provide such ressources. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
