On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:14:07 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:38:48 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:35:19 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:21:21AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: >>>> Sven Luther wrote: >> [...] >>>> > >>>> > This is not a ubuntu related problem though, and the help the ubuntu >>>> > kernel/security team has provided us was invaluable, but it should maybe >>>> > not >>>> > be necessary if the information was not unrightfully hold from us in the >>>> > first >>>> > time. >>>> >>>> You seem to be implying that ubuntu is providing you with confidential >>>> prior warning about kernel security holes, but I really doubt this, >>> >> >> Actually, that was the case for a while (before ubuntu's kernel team went >> on vacation, and I went on vacation). However, w/ all the vacations >> that have been happening, it hasn't been the case for a few months. >> >> > > Rather, I was mistaken; they were things that had already been made > public.
And, as a perfect example; http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0210 This has already been made public, and has been fixed in Ubuntu kernels for 2 days. Sure would be nice the cve folks to let the rest of us in on it, eh? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
