Hi, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> testing-proposed-updates is _still_ missing autobuilders.
>> May I respectfully ask why that's been a problem for half a year now, IIRC?
> So if it has taken us 6 months to get the problems with testing-security
> sorted out, what do you suppose we would have done for security support
> if we had frozen and released six months ago, without first sorting out
> these problems?
Umm, sorry? I was asking why t-s/t-p-u has taken so long to implement in
the first place.
I have *not* been asking why we didn't proceed without it -- I know that
that's not feasible.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
