I demand that Aurelien Jarno may or may not have written... > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:58:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > As Steve wrote [snip] >> | - the release architecture must have N+1 buildds where N is the number >> | required to keep up with the volume of uploaded packages >> The reason for this proposal should be instantly clear to everyone who >> ever suffered from buildd backlogs. :)
> Which means a lot more buildd. [...] Or, possibly, faster buildds. Take arm, for example: I had a quick look yesterday at buildd.d.o to see what hardware was in use - all SA110. "All" that it needs is somebody with an Iyonix <URL:http://www.iyonix.com/> or some other XScale-based machine to step forward... [snip] -- | Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at | woody, sarge, | Northumberland | youmustbejoking | RISC OS | Toon Army | demon co uk | Retrocomputing: a PC card in a Risc PC BNFL: Buy No Fish Locally -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]