Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The requirement sucks, lets leave it at that. If the machine dies, I can > have two to replace it within a day or two. > > The point being, there's no reason to have two seperate machines when one > can do the job. As long as it keeps up, then there should be no cause for > concern.
If you have one machine, and it dies, and it takes you a day or two to replace it, then it cannot "do the job". If you can guarantee that it never dies (somehow), then maybe it could. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
