* Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 03:25]: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > > > >I have an e3500 to replace both auric and vore (and the raid), but I > > > > >haven't gotten an ok from James to do so yet. > > > > > > > > That would cut the number of sparc buildds down to one, when two are > > > > required for RC archtectures under the new proposal. > > > > > > That's ok because two buildd's can run on the one machine. It has 6 cpu's. > > > > That cannot be the requirement. The point has to be an additional and > > independently functioning piece of hardware. If the disk blows or it > > is compromised or something, the others should be able to continue. > The requirement sucks, lets leave it at that. If the machine dies, I can > have two to replace it within a day or two.
Ah, so why is vore down now for some time now? If it's so easy to replace a broken machine, why don't you just do it? (And, BTW, you might be on vacation, sick, ... - we need more than just one machine.) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
