On Thursday 17 March 2005 22:09, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 10231 March 1977, David Schmitt wrote: > >> > Collecting tidbits of > >> > information concerning the various packages rotting in NEW and making > >> > that information public. > >> > >> A list of packages-in-NEW is available on the Web, including binary > >> package names, bugs closed, et al. > >> Nothing more can be done by the average bored DD, since they cannot > >> access these packages, hence not do most of the necessary checks. > > > > Isn't there a mirror of NEW on merkel? > > Yes, but you cant read anything else than .changes files in NEW.
I think it was Anthony who mentioned a script he uses for testing the NEW packages. It'd probably be good-enough[tm] for a first iteration to link output of that script to ftp-master.d.o/new.html or mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something like that. > > kernel-patch-2.4-{blooper,pom} (1 year): > > * Fixes for minor annoying kernel bugs > > * Netfilter patch-o-matic patches to base level, IPSEC policy match > > Both should be superceded by debian-kernel. Could be REJECTed. > > Should/Could? Conservative formula; I have no idea what patches are included. Maintainer should step forward to explain[1]. Regards, David [1] Or receive deserved rotting in NEW. -- - hallo... wie gehts heute? - *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch* - gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;) -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15