* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050319 12:35]: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:20:34AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > > - at least two buildd administrators > > > This allows the buildd administrator to take vacations, etc.
> This is at odds with what I've heard from some buildd maintainers that > having multiple buildd maintainers makes it hard to avoid stepping on one > another's feet, so I wouldn't want to set a requirement like this without > further discussion. Actually, there was some discussion about that in Vancouver :) It boils down to more or less having at least two people to be able to maintain any of the buildds, so that if the primary buildd admin goes on vacation / is ill / ..., that doesn't put this buildd completly off-line. In fact, this has already happened in the past, without anybody except the buildd admins noticing it. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]