Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The choice is to either restrict the required client-side fanciness to
> what most of our mirrors are willing to accept, or go without mirrors 
> (OK, OK ... fewer mirrors anyway), which is something I don't think we'd
> want.

The whole point of SCC was to go without mirrors.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to