Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * the release architecture must be publicly available to buy new > > Avoids a situation where Debian is keeping an architecture alive.
I don't understand this. What is the problem with Debian is keeping an architecture alive? What problem are you trying to solve here? > * the value of N above must not be > 2 > > This effectively sets an upper limit on the length of time a single > package may take to build, which helps ensure that doing things like > security fixes for Openoffice doesn't become a problem. If the point is to set an upper limit on the length of time a single package may take to build, why not take that directly as a criterion? It is even more objective. It might also encourage people to split unreasonably large packages. -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]