On 04-Apr-05, 02:48 (CDT), Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scribit Adam Heath dies 01/04/2005 hora 19:10:
> > Additionally, as a way to weed out other problems, any patches that
> > are leafs(ie, don't depend on anything) are applied in a random order.
>
> For the sake of my curiosity:
>
> - what problems do thsi random order could weed?
Unnoted dependencies that just happen to be fulfilled due to a
consistent (though arbitrary) application order. By applying in a
different order each time, you should trigger an error fairly quickly.
> - won't it be more difficult to trakcs bugs if it isn't predictable?
If you get an error during the patching process, it should be fairly
easy to determine that it's an un-marked dependency, and then find it by
hand. You can also impose arbitrary dependencies among your supposedly
"independent" patches until you find the troublesome combination.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
