On Mon, April 11, 2005 22:26, Emanuele Rocca said: > Well some differences came out:
> - linda has proper l10n strings for most errors (in German) > - different output formats > - different test sets > - linda is faster So, linda is better than lintian? Faster and localized, that sound like good benefits to me. I haven't heard anyone listing the benefits of lintian over linda. Why aren't we using linda then instead of lintian and merge any tests that lintian has and linda doesn't into linda? That would give us all a better tool, right? These programs have a very limited scope; it's better compared with creating www1.debian.org and www2.debian.org that both have different content and features than comparing it with vi/emacs. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]