On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:52:19PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:06:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I've heard three different stories describing this GR: > > 1. it contained only Editorial amendments and didn't change anything > > 2. the Debian developers decided in this GR that documentation has to > > fulfill the full DFSG guidelines > > 3. many Debian mistakenly agreed with it because they mistakenly > > beliefed after reading the title that it only contained editorial > > and no actual changes > > The SC, prior to GR2004-003, already required that documentation be > DFSG-free. I've never seen any strong argument otherwise, and > GR2004-003 simply made it explicitly clear. (GR2004-004 didn't make > any sense at all, nor does it make any sense that Sarge can ship > with non-free documentation, and at the time I found the posts of > the RM on the topic to make no sense at all, but I was satisfied with > the results of GR2004-003 and am able to bear the strangeness of > GR2004-004 for now, since it'll expire on its own.) >...
If it contained only editorial changes as you are saying, you've thereby proven that your statement the documentation licencing was "firmly decided" was wrong. > Glenn Maynard cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]