On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:31:53PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:03:07AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:31:52AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > If you really want to retain your "everything is software" point of > > > view, think about the consequences and work on them _before_ starting > > > the removals - and provide solutions for them that are available at the > > > time of the removals. > [...] > > And Debian has tried to work on reducing the impact, by trying > > to convince the FSF to fix their license. Not only have they > > not done so, they've completely stonewalled, refusing to discuss > > the issue at all. > > That's completely untrue, actually, though I think that stuff is still > confined to debian-private.
I don't particularly care about super-secret discussions that I can't even see. Regardless, the FSF hasn't fixed their license, they've never indicated in any place I can see that there's any chance at all they'll remove invariant sections, and they've had a very long time to do so. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]