Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...but quite sad (or happy?) to see that nearly only the proposal to handle > architectures differently got criticism...while this proposal contains > several other key point.
I do not understand why the Nybbles team mixed their good news about sarge with their foreseeably controversial plans or proposal for etch. I fear that we will have a huge, long flamewar. And many competent, active people will start coding implementations of alternatives to the Nybbles plan, alternatives that will allow us to make releases also of the SCC/tier-2 arches. I think all this discussion about etch should be delayed until sarge is out. Of course we would need a statement from the Nybbles team that they do not intend to make decicions, and not to settle facts before a thorough discussion has taken place - after the release. -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer