>>>>> "steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
steve> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:06:31PM -0400, sean finney steve> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > >> The according bug is #306608. >> having read through the bug report, it seems to me the >> appropriate thing to have done all along was add a Conflicts >> statement, which really does no harm and does resolve the >> issue. steve> Sorry, but insisting that a maintainer add a Conflicts: steve> against a separately RC-buggy package which is not in steve> testing and will shortly be removed from unstable is just steve> silly. It can be done, but for the most part this bug is steve> going to resolve itself, and there's no reason the steve> maintainer should treat adding this conflict as a high steve> priority under the circumstances. But you remove the package from testing doesn't mean we won't have users with it installed since it was present there so, IMHO, the Conflict is need. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]