hi I see that some people are opposing using "4.0", so I give up. I just write this e-mail to better understand why
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:17:45AM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote: > >>So I would much prefer if sarge would be called "Debian 4" >> >>Do you agree? > > I would prefer to be maintainer of the well known distribution which > *doesn't* bump versions only for the fun of it. what is wrong in "bumping version numbers?" (and I mean, particularly in this context) so, (I am just curious) , why do people (e.g. you) oppose that? <joke> we all learn from arithmetic that there is an infinite number of positive integers, so we are not in risk of exhausting them </joke> > I know that for most people numbers have some magic meaning, but please can > we try to provide stable OS by its quality and not version number? > Calling sarge 4.0 won't make it better. neither calling it 3.1 and I never implied that calling it 4.0 makes it better it just sounds better (for me at least) neither choice prevents us from working in making Sarge better -- bye a. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]