Hamish Moffatt wrote: >>On Friday 06 May 2005 11:22am, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> >> >>>Hi >>> >>> Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with >>> it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we >>>aren't Debian). >>> >Not necessary. For 'sattrack' for example, I got permission for us to >distribute it in Debian. But I don't know if that extends to >Debian-AMD64 (an unofficial distribution) and Ubuntu would certainly >have to ask for their own permission. > >
Actually, non-free is not Debian as well (as far as I recall), but all of us consider it part of the Debian project. Honestly, I would consider the AMD64 port part of the Debian project since it is a *port* and you can find it at http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ . The only differences between non-free and AMD64 non-free is that AMD64 is not part of the Debian mirror network (ie. not officially part of Sid/Sarge). Anyway, I think if package can be distributed by Debian, it can implicitly be distributed by any of the Debian ports, released or not. - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]