In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > - / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing > problems for /boot.
Why is that? > - a larger FS has more chance of failing so you risk having a fully > broken system more often And two file systems have even more chance. One read only file system is pretty stable. > - /usr can be easily network (shared accross the same arch) mounted > while / (due to /etc) can't > - / needs functioning device nodes on it while usr can be mounted nodev I agreee, those arguments and the netboot stuff is an argment for a smaller root partition. However our root filesystem is too big anyway. Greetings Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
