On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > But setting up autobuilders doesn't require a new infrastructure > > (and shouldn't require more than half a year). > > Wasn't the infrastructure a prerequisite for woody and is working? > > It turned out that the central part of the existing infrastructure > didn't scale up well enough to cope with the new architectures in sarge.
There are no new architectures in sarge. > The number of individual buildds asking which packages were avaliable to > build created load problems - check the mailing list archives for more > detail. I can't remember if improvements in redundancy weren't an issue > either. This part is true. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
