On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Matt Zimmerman] > > I don't have any hard statistics, but here are some random examples of > > patches whose development was sponsored by Canonical, were tested and proven > > in Ubuntu, were proactively submitted to Debian by an Ubuntu developer, and > > remain in debbugs months later without comment from the maintainer: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298060 > > This one got lots of comments from the defacto maintainer of the > shadow package, Christian Perrier.
OK, I didn't realize that. There was a fairly clear consensus at the end that this was the right thing to do, and yet no action was taken, so I assumed that no one present had the authority to make the change. > So half of the random examples were left in silence, and the other > half got serious considerations. Good to know. I'm sure that you aren't drawing very firm conclusions based on a sample size of 2, just as I wasn't. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]