Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Which architecture do you refer to? All architectures supported by > debian are supported much better by 2.6 thn by 2.4, in fact none of > them is supported anymore upstream except for important bugfixes.
Be that as it may, my feeling from reading a great many installation reports is that giving users the ability to try 2.4 if 2.6 fails to work (or vice versa) saves a fair number of installs that otherwise wouldn't be possible for various reasons. Better supported != perfectly supported after all, and 2.6 certianly still contains some regressions from 2.4. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
