On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:08:23PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >[Josselin Mouette] > >> However that won't help the architecture make it to a Vancouver-like > >> release. > > > >I suspect you have misunderstood the content and intention of the > >proposal from the group meeting in Vancover. > > The intent was not at all that clear.
Putting aside that issue for the moment, at the time the Vancouver proposal was released, it was presented as a starting point for discussion and not a fait accompli. Has the considerable discussion that's taken place since then caused any of the involved parties to consider adjustments, or a total rework, of the proposal? Have any of the alternatives, such as a mostly source-based distribution for some supported architectures, been considered? If not, when can we expect the Vancouver/SCC changes to come down the line? Thanks, -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
