On 12 June 2005 at 21:13, Martin Michlmayr wrote: | In #232777, Dirk Eddelbuettel and I had a discussion about octave2.0. | | Dirk wrote: | > We should consider removing octave2.0 as well. It is old code [1], and | > upstream decided years ago to not port this code branch, but to concentrate | > on octave2.1 instead -- and octave2.1 is where all development has been for | > quite some time. | and | > I had planned to 'after stable is out'. I'll try to do a maintenance release | > of 2.0.17. If that fails, I can still remove it. | | Do you think it should be removed now?
and On 12 June 2005 at 21:14, Martin Michlmayr wrote: | * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-12 21:13]: | > Do you think it should be removed now? | | http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00089.html lists some | other octave related packages that should probably be removed. Yes, if you look at my aggregates at http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=edd&comaint=yes&reset=yes you see that the three packages octave2.0, octave-ci and octave-matcompat are all slated to be removed. Jeroen reminded me regarding one of the three last week, and I filed bug reports for the other two. That concludes the Octave transfer from me over to the well-run pkg-octave group at Alioth. Thanks for the follow-up, though. Regards, Dirk -- Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]