On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 17:11 -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > > On 6/13/05, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That's a stupid argument. > > > > It's not that stupid. > > But it is.
Calling an argument stupid is another way of saying you disagree with it but cannot be bothered to adduce your own arguments -- or don't want to risk someone else's calling them stupid. It is the logical fallacy of Appeal to Ridicule. > > If other files shouldn't be there, the specs should explicitly state > that. > > Use just a *little* bit of common sense. FHS does explicitly forbid binaries in /etc, but does not forbid other things that are not configuration files. The obvious implication is that, though those things may be undesirable, they are not forbidden. It is certainly desirable to keep things as much in accordance with the intention of policy as possible, but policy and the FHS do allow some latitude, even if only by not making their definitions rigorously complete. Since I don't know why Martin chose to do it this way, I can't advance his arguments in favour of using that latitude. -- Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E 1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA ======================================== Do you want to know God? http://www.lfix.co.uk/knowing_god.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]