** Matthew Garrett :: > Humberto Massa Guimarăes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it? I seemed to recall that the MPL contained a > > choice-of-venue clause, and that -legal deemed choice-of-venue > > as non-free, because imposes a burden on the licensee in case of > > litigation. > > "-legal decided" is not a terribly meaningful phrase. Lack of
You are really putting words in my mouth (hand?). I have written "-legal deemed", which I think means "-legal seemed to reach the consensus that..." > choice of venue imposes a burden on the licensor in case of > litigation - I see no reason why one is obviously free and the > other non-free. Imagine the following: by your reasoning, there is *no* free software, because writing the software to start with is a burden on the licensor. -- HTH, Massa