* Humberto Massa Guimarăes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050615 14:07]: > > Not really, because the DFSG is not supposed to apply to trademarks. > > This is the center of Wouter's and Marco's argument, IMHO. But I don't > see anything in the DFSG restricting it to copyrights or excluding > trademarks or patents. So, it is my Humble Opinion that DFSG#8 applies > broadly.
Apart from the historical fact that the DFSG was never written with trademarks in mind - it speak about licenses, which is _not_ the thing attached with Trademarks usually (as Trademarks are regulated by really different laws than Licenses; the first ones are more or less a monopole handed out by the state, whereas the second ones are contracts). Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
