On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:23:39PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:48:55AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > > * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Where possible, sure. But "principles" doesn't mean "the rules should be > > > > exactly the same". > > > > > > Please stop putting words in my mouth. I never said that the rules > > > should necessarily be the same. But I am of the opinion that the > > > spirit of DFSG #8 should apply. > > > > To trademarks? Why? I don't see why that would be necessary, or even a > > good idea; but I'm sure I can be convinced given good arguments. > > It's a question of fairness, which I think is embodied by DFSG > #8. We're getting this offer from MoFo because, I think, we are > Debian. We're big and we're cool, there's no denying it :) But other > entities, equally deserving of the trademark usage from a quality > standpoint won't get it because MoFo doesn't care about them.
Is that a given, or is that a theory? If it's a given, I agree with you. If it's a theory, you should find out whether it's true. If it's not, there's no problem. -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]