Ian Murdock wrote:
> On 6/16/05, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I strongly suspect they're
> > > more interested in your X.org and GNOME 2.10. Given
> > > that, a lot of this divergence seems pretty gratutious to me.
> > 
> > Yes, these are both very interesting to users.
> > 
> > Which 'divergence' do you mean when you reference that -- X.Org/GNOME
> > 2.10, or glibc?
> 
> glibc. Shipping X.org and GNOME 2.10 adds value, since sarge doesn't
> ship them. Shipping glibc 2.6.5 vs. glibc 2.6.2 just adds
> incompatibilities.

As well as bugfixes and things like ppc64 NPTL.


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to