On 6/28/05, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How would you treat the librsvg case? Currently, librsvg2-2 and > librsvg2-common both depend on each other. The librsvg2-2 package > contains the library, and librsvg2-common contains a loader that allows > gdk_pixbuf to load SVG files. > * librsvg2-common needs to depend on librsvg2-2 because it links to the > library; > * librsvg2-2 depends on librsvg2-common because most applications > linking to librsvg2 also expect the SVG loader to be available.
So they expect something to be available without depending on a package that provides it? Sounds like a bug.