On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Matt Kraai wrote: > texi2html's behavior changed recently: if it is invoked with > -split=chapter, old versions place the HTML files in the same > directory as the documentation source, whereas new versions place the > generated files in a subdirectory. > > After I'd filed a few bugs about this, Santiago Vila suggested that I > should contact d-d-a instead and allow developers a chance to fix > their packages before filing bugs. > > I checked the packages that build-depend on texi2html and found that > 19 of them fail because of this problem (not including the ones I've > already filed bugs against). Should I file bugs individually, post to > d-d-a, or do something else?
I vote for a post to d-d-a, wait a week, then file bugs. However, I would like to see a texi2html option to get the old behaviour first... In some cases, converting a debian/rules to the new behaviour becomes an ugly hack, as there is already an executable having the name texi2html would use for the directory. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
