Hi, > > Having a solid naming scheme will allow me to > > > > ldd /usr/lib/libwhatever.so to track down its > > shared library dependency, and appending "-dev" > > to individual package to create the list of > > requisite -dev packages. > > With the current scheme it is: > > ldd /usr/lib/libwhatever.so to track down its shared library > dependency, strip the soversion and appending "-dev" to individual > package to create the list of requisite -dev packages. > > And, by the way, that list is just plain wrong.
Okay, currently d-shlibs is using objdump, and does not recursively look for dependencies. gotom suggested to use ldd, to obtain the full path of shared libraries, and I do see the limitation with using ldd, as you pointed out illustratively in your example. regards, junchi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]