On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:12:10PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I think overall it serves the users more to default to running missed
> cronjobs on boot than not. If that causes you problems you can always
> purge anarcron or fcron or protect the jobs itself. There might eb
> cases where it harms but those should be the minority.

Seems to make sense. Are there any cases where having anacron installed
by default would mess something up?

-- 
gram


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to