On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:12:10PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > I think overall it serves the users more to default to running missed > cronjobs on boot than not. If that causes you problems you can always > purge anarcron or fcron or protect the jobs itself. There might eb > cases where it harms but those should be the minority.
Seems to make sense. Are there any cases where having anacron installed by default would mess something up? -- gram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
