* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It doesn't exist; I think it's a great idea. Perhaps a tool named
> dh_libtool, which populates a substvar named ${libtool:Depends}?
This sounds reasonable to me; I appriciate that it's a libtool-specific
thing and not a blanket policy. :)
> FWIW, detecting a fixed libtool would be rather difficult, since it's the
> libtool used by the depending application which does the recursion and
> therefore needs to be fixed.
I'd think we could come up with a way to detect the version of libtool
in use, somehow. :) Could always have the tool accept a command-line
option to force it one way or the other. Then we could run around and
file bugs to use the tool, and then bugs to upgrade libtool. :)
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
