On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 22:56 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > So you're complaining that this jackd bug is exemplary of > "unneccessary" breakages in unstable, and yet you don't even know if > there is a good reason for this bug. You don't know if this is tied to > the gcc change.
I believe that #318098 can be simply avoided by not doing dist-upgrade (ie. not install new conflicting jackd). How simple and how much flames :-(. -- Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
