I demand that Jon Dowland may or may not have written... > On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +0000, W. Borgert wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:26:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >>> However, I am wondering if it is a bug that the pages are not even valid >>> HTML 4.01. Is this a bug? Should I file a bug agains the b.d.o psuedo >> Shouldn't it be XHTML nowadays?
> I personally would like to see them XHTML1.0 at least. [...] That or HTML 4.01; there's no real difference. Although if XHTML /is/ used, you should be aware that some browsers need the space in "<br />" (for example) else they'll fail to recognise it. -- | Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at | sarge, | Northumberland | youmustbejoking | RISC OS | Toon Army | demon co uk | Kill all extremists! I'd like to, but I'm trying to be less popular. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]