On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]: > > Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, > > arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian > > Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html > > I won't go through the trouble to compile the extensive list of > problems and design issues with SVN. >
OK. Then please just name two or three. I am geniunely interested. I switched from CVS to subversion exclusively for my own use when Sarge went stable. I still use CVS occasionally since some projects to which I contribute use CVS (e.g., on sourceforge). -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
pgpVGR3CfOBiW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
