* Roberto C. Sanchez: > There is a good reason that CVS development has stagnated. CVS is > broken and there are better alternatives.
Some people say it's its rotten codebase. A rewrite from scratch hasn't got this problem. The RCS-based file format isn't too bad and optimizes for some common (access to recent version) and not-so-commonn (annotate) operations. (Try annotate with cogito..) I welcome a OpenCVS package, subject to two conditions: The description should describe the virtues of the package, and not dismiss GNU CVS as bad. And it should not provide "cvs" unless permanent comaptibility is a goal, including the command line switches. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
