On 8/21/05, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm quite confident that there will be an upgrade path from Arch archives to > bzr archives. Canonical, amongst other people, have too much invested in > Arch to just let that history fester. As for hct, I understand it is a > wrapper frontend to baz/bzr to provide the sorts of functionality that > package maintainers need, instead of being a general-purpose revision > control tool.
Agreed. And in case I didn't agree, Martin Poole has just posted a message mentioning that Canonical is slowly shifting focus from baz to bzr and will provide an upgrade path. I can't find it in any useful archive to provide a link. Sorry. Arch is being slowly abandoned. The SCM space is vibrant, but Arch won't be here (as an evolving tool) for long. I'm not _that_ sad about it. regards, martin