Jonas Smedegaard dijo [Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 07:28:55PM +0200]: > > We also came to the conclusion that some of the requirements proposed in > > Vancouver would make sense as initial requirements -- requirements that > > a port would need to fulfill in order to be allowed on the mirror > > network -- but not necessarily as an 'overall' requirement -- a > > requirement that a port will always need to fulfill if it wants to be > > part of a stable release, even if it's already on the mirror network. > > Those would look like this: > [snip] > > Overall: > [snip] > > - binaries must have been built and signed by official Debian > > Developers > > Currently, sponsored packages are only signed, not built, by official > Debian Developers. > > Is that intended to change, or is it a typo in the proposal?
Umh... It is possible, yes, to sign and upload a package you didn't build yourself - I would only do it in case I know my sponsoree knows _very_ well (i.e. at least as well as me) how to do stuff. I think there is (but I cannot say for sure) the common practice to build before uploading - You cannot be sure, of course. This, also, cannot become policy, as it cannot be checked... But I feel this is common practice already. -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)1451-2244 / 5623-0154 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
