On Aug 24, Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is not strictly needed, but I cannot avoid it until udev will > > become mandatory to have hotplug support (is there a consensus on this?). > Could udev be modified to not run the hotplug.d handlers > if /sbin/hotplug is missing? (Or is that even the right thing to do?) It's not, the problem is that some other packages install their handler there instead of just using an udev RUN rule, this is why I'm still supporting hotplug.d/.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
