On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:39:13PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: > > There are some architectures where 2.4 has been abandonded uptream, > > and these are being removed from the arcive > > powerpc (ok, thats one, not some)
> hppa is as well. It is still useful to have the 2.4 kernel-images in the > archive since they are still more stable on some machines. Is it? There were no hppa 2.4 kernels included in sarge, because we were told by Thibaut that the upstream branch was rotting and not worth including. Is there really a reason to think it will be in *better* shape for etch? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
