to, 2005-08-25 kello 09:35 +0200, Marc Chantreux kirjoitti: > that is a point which surprise me : i understand the dash for a posix > and lightweight attitude but why use bash as "modern shell" ? why not > perl or zsh (which are both more powerfull) ?
I think it would be good for us to take pity on the sysadmins and avoid forcing them to learn a multitude of scripting languages just to be able to understand init.d scripts. At least when I do sysadmin work, I often have to at least peek at the init.d scripts; for some reason, this happens much less often with package maintainer scripts. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
