On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3)
> > So the libcurl3 in sarge and etch will have ABI incompatibilities? > at the release time of etch this problem will regard only > external software. this kind of installations will be able to use > libcurl3-openssl-dev package or switch to GnuTLS. > is this reasonable enough? No, definitely not. You cannot change the ABI of an existing library package, especially not one that's been in a stable release; you need to rename it instead. But no one has yet answered my question: *why* are there ABI differences between the gnutls and openssl builds? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature