Scripsit Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Henning Makholm writes:
>> I doubt that "people who do not wish to become legally bound to appear >> at the the author's home court whenever he files a frivolous lawsuit" >> can be meaningfully described as a "group of persons" that can be >> discriminated against. If everybody belongs to the group, is it >> meaningfull to discriminate against it? > Not everyone belongs to the group: In all cases to date (and likely > all cases in the future), some people would naturally be subject to > the court's jurisdiction. Unless they have for some reason already decided conclusively that they will never leave that jurisdiction and settle elsewhere, they are still inconvenienced. > As an example, the QPL discriminates against everyone who does not > live conveniently close to Olso. And against people who do live close to Oslo but may later contemplate to move elsewhere. -- Henning Makholm "Nej, hvor er vi altså heldige! Længe leve vor Buxgører Sansibar Bastelvel!"