On Wednesday 28 September 2005 18:12, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like > the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
> 1) Build all the packages used by debootstrap to generate a basedebs.tgz > 2) Certify this basedebs works with a fresh instalation. > 3) Start building a incresing number of packages, but certainly only a > small subset of the i386 architecture. Similar thing was already done for woody, so you may not have to start from scratch: http://people.debian.org/~andersee/uwoody/ > The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment > (as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture > i386-uclibc with gnu name i386-uclibc-linux. And I'd like to ask: Is it > OK? The naming might need some adjusting, and you may have to maintain it for quite a while under unofficial banner, but I think the idea is great. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]