Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> * Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051001 22:42]:
>> > Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> > > Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There
>> > > is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are
>> > > read. I don't know if those addresses are documented anywhere.
>> > They're not. Perhaps they could be? :-) That would be a big help.
>>
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-automation
>
> Not good enough. Please add it to the central place we all go hunting for
> buildd issues: buildd.debian.org.
And to http://www.de.debian.org/intro/organization as well, please.
> The most effective way to do it is IMHO a BTS entry for each ARCH port, to
> track down all porting issues with a damn good memory. THAT's transparency,
> and it is much more manageable than trying to contact a number of mailing
> lists (which are often quite effective) and email addresses (which aren't
> _apparently_). The PTS takes care of keeping whichever email addresses
> informed.
Seconded.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
