Martin Zobel wrote: > On Saturday, 08 Oct 2005, you wrote: > > Anyone working on assembling the information for this? > > > > It ought to be a slam dunk, but I'd hate to see it not happen because > > nobody bothered to collect the information. > > do you mean i*3*86 or ia-32? > i*3*86 died already before sarge release.
IA-32, except it's misleadingly *called* i386. :-) Disgustingly, I worked out that we could have revived real i386 support for etch thanks to changes in gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 which nobody bothered to advertise. But it's too late now, since everything is built with arch=i486. :-P -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
