Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I read most of his points as being factual, some of which might be > comparisons to and constructive criticisms of Linux. Not disappointing > at all.
Well some points were factual, some were sun marketng, but it all did seem to be tinged with a vaguely pejorative tone (against linux). Using a consistent and obvious pejorative tone isn't very constructive. I suppose it's just the typical sun-weenie attitude, but for whatever reason, just about everything Erast writes, true or not, sounds like it was written by a sun PR person. It's quite amazing reading through this whole huge thread -- he can't seem to say _anything_ without giving the impression that he's thinking "oh you poor deprived linux users..." -miles -- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
