Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The same benefit that accrue from freedom of software still > remain if that software bits represent a presentation; the > software/presentation can be modified to suit a particular need, and > redistributed, excepts can be used in other presentations, ica can be > part of a larger educational effort. Like any other software, having > the free software/presentation bits leads to collaboation, > invention, and greater benefit to the community of users. > > It is a pity that a conference of debian developers, and > others interested in developing debian, which is itself dedicated to > being wholly free, and who has just rejected the GFDL as not being > free enough to be a part of debian, is now saying that in order to be > a part of Debian's conference, anything goes, and the sole rationale > given is that non-free stuff, while restricting the usage rights of > the community, is OK to ensure the success of the conference.
Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do apt-get install debconf6-doc ? cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]